Comparing Continuous and Retrospective Emotion Ratings in Remote VR Study
Published in 16th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX 2024), Karlshamn, Sweden, 2024
Warsinke, M., Kojic, T., Vergari, M., Spang, R. O., Voigt-Antons, J.-N. & Möller, S.
We compare continuous in-VR affect ratings with retrospective post-experience reports in a fully remote VR study. Continuous ratings capture temporal dynamics but add interaction overhead; retrospective ratings reduce burden at the cost of temporal precision. Correlations and divergences are analyzed to provide guidance on selecting emotion measurement strategies for remote XR evaluations.
Recommended citation: Warsinke, M., Kojic, T., Vergari, M., Spang, R. O., Voigt-Antons, J.-N. & Möller, S. (2024, June). Comparing Continuous and Retrospective Emotion Ratings in Remote VR Study. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX 2024), Karlshamn, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.16487