Publications on XR, QoE & human-centered computing

Hand tracking, voice and passthrough compared in one study, against usability and workload rather than against each other in isolation.

Sets out what an interactive digital twin has to do before an XR application built on it can be called responsible.

Surveys the physiological measures — EEG, eye tracking, arousal — that quality research can actually use, and what each of them cannot tell you.

Reads streaming quality off facial expression and gaze instead of asking viewers to rate it — the method above, applied to a running service.

Generates synthetic medical time series so that models can be built where real patient records cannot be shared.